However, very little research has focused on the post-Gezi neighbourhood forums as a new form of political experience for Turkey, except the studies on Izmir and Istanbul (Akçalı 2018 Ozduzen 2019 Ugur-Cinar and Gunduz-Arabaci 2020). The Gezi forums lasted about two more years and became a new, but influential societal actor in Turkey’s changing political climate. Scholars examined the motivations and demands of protestors to go out onto the streets (Kongar and Küçükkaya 2013 Özkoray and Özkoray 2013), and whether this was a class movement (Boratav 2013) or an accumulation of urban solidarity alliances in the big cities (Erensü and Karaman 2017), which were discussed mostly in the conceptual framework of social movements. Since the Gezi movement was a remarkable episode in the history of social movements in Turkey, it garnered wide coverage both in political and academic arenas (e.g. The neighbourhood forums were formed by Gezi protesters but there is a lack of research on them. The street protests lasted about a month and were gradually replaced by meetings, protests, and other activities organised by neighbourhood forums across the country. The Gezi urban uprisings led to street protests, occupation of spaces, and neighbourhood forums in many cities, including those where there was historically no or limited experience of acts of local solidarity. As the movement spread across the country, it represented an upsurge of the indignation that had built up towards the central political elite due to expanded centralised decision-making processes. When the police used violence to try to disperse the growing crowd, the Istanbul-based urban resistance went national and became about police violence, conservative social policies, and job insecurity as well as neoliberal urban transformations. Given the rise in and intensification of urban transformation through state-led gentrification in Turkey over the previous two decades, the Gezi movement was a backlash towards authoritarian and entrepreneurial interventions in urban practices (Eraydın and Taşan-Kök 2014). The Gezi movement, as it started in Istanbul, was an outburst of the accumulated resentment towards mainly the political and economic elite at the urban scale. The Gezi movement in Turkey started as a seemingly small-scale protest against a local government project to demolish a cultural heritage building and the park next to it to build a shopping mall in Taksim Square, the historical centre of Istanbul. In May 2013, the urban youth took to the streets to stop a redevelopment project in Istanbul and protests quickly spread throughout Turkey. Bu araştırmanın vaka seçimi, kentsel müşterekleşmenin küresel kozmopolit kentlere göre daha az finansal yatırım baskısı altında, ancak ulusal düzeydeki politikanın merkezinde olan bir yerelde nasıl deneyimlendiğine odaklanmıştır. Bir yöntem olarak müşterekleşme örgütlenme pratiklerini ifade eder içerik olarak müşterekleşme siyasi eylemin biçimine ve anlamına odaklanır ve, talep olarak müşterekleşme, kent hakkı söylemininin pratik kullanımlarını ifade eder. Müşterekleşme değişime kapalı bir kavram olarak değil, tam tersine yerelin tarihsel politik potansiyeli ile doğrudan ilişkilidir. Bu kavramsal çerçeve, müşterekleşme parasal ilişkilere dayanmayan bir toplumsal süreç olarak görmeye odaklanan bir anlayış sunar. Bu makale, kentsel müşterekleşme uygulamalarını yöntem, içerik ve talep olarak kavramsallaştırmaktadır. Ankara Gezi forumlarının faaliyetleri, yeni talepler ve yöntemler açısından kentsel müşterekleşme pratikleri olarak incelenebilir. Ankara'daki mahalle forumları 2013'teki Gezi eylemleri sırasında başladı ve yaklaşık üç yıl sürdü.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |